TEWKSBURY MASTER PLAN COMMITTEE MEETING
The meeting was called to order at
Regarding the
Per the Town Manager, the committee’s next meeting of
Due to technical problems with the Power Point presentation,
the meeting was recessed for ten minutes by a motion made by Gill and seconded
by Reed. The meeting was then reopened
at
Terry Szold was in attendance to
present and discuss COG’s Land Use Technical Paper #2, specifically
with regards Route 38/Main Street and the concepts discussed in Challenge #1,
“The Future of the Main Street Corridor:
Guiding Growth, Creating New Districts, and Improving Design”. (The committee had already previously agreed
with the idea in principle at the
COG feels that the Town has done a good job with some of its
newer development along
The committee agreed with Szold
that the Town deserves to be able to benefit from the proposed corridor design
guidelines sooner rather than later, and to do so, implementation will be
key. This could be accomplished as soon
as the Master Plan is accepted, by writing specific design guidelines listed
for each district, and have them on file with the Zoning By
Laws. Applicants will then see what will
be encouraged, and conversely, what will be discouraged, within each of the
districts. Also the committee discussed
design guidelines, the options being Design Principles, Design Guidelines
and Zoning Regulations. Linking of the
Master plan guidelines to the Zoning Bylaws was discussed as a possible quick
solution to get these standards in the forefront for decision making purposes.
A suggestion was made to change the name of the Commercial
District to “Trull” or “Wamesit”
District. Those present agreed that a name change would be a good idea for this
proposed district, but a final decision was not reached at this meeting. It was
also agreed that some of the boundaries can, and probably will be expanded,
and/or narrowed. Reed felt that there is
a development opportunity at the boundaries of the proposed Gateway and Town
Center Districts near
Szold displayed a plan of a
“traditional” commercial strip development where the buildings are set back
with the parking lots in the front and along the street. The committee then viewed a “smart growth
alternative” plan of a commercial strip development where the buildings are
closer to the street, with the parking situated along the sides and in the rear
and the parking broken up by attractive landscaping and walkways. There was some concern about safety, both
vehicular and pedestrian, but Szold stated that the
“smart growth” parking layout actually calms traffic and usually reduces safety
issues with regards to traffic. Sweet
also suggested that language could be written into the plan regarding public safety
goals.
The committee then discussed Challenge #2 in the Land Use
paper, “Guiding Growth in Industrial Districts”. COG feels that the Town has an opportunity to
create additional types of industrial zones that would be customized
accordingly in relation to surrounding land uses, and also striving to be more
harmonious to abutters and neighborhoods.
The three proposed types of Industrial zoning discussed were, “Heavy
Industry” (near the highways ie 495), “Light
Industry” (adjacent to Residential with buffering design standards), and a
“Neighborhood Transitional District”. Szold also suggested that the densities of the future
developments could be controlled by establishing Floor Area Ratio (FAR), requirements
for the heavy industrial zones.
Before discussing those additional land use items, the
Committee opened the discussion up to the public that was present. Most
comments focused on the general acceptance and need for a Master Plan to
provide for control and character in Town. David Cressman,
Town Manager, expressed his opinion on potential redevelopment sites. He sees
the Master Plan goals and identification of the different areas of
It was suggested by the consultants that the Town may want
to start with design “principles” to get started quickly instead of full blown
guidelines.
The next meeting will be on